Glucose Management
BSL is often erratic in the ICU patient. In general, target BSL should be 8-12mmol/L. This is:
Other suggested targets include 8-11mmol/L or 6-10mmol/L.
- Relatively hyperglycaemic
- Safe
Attempts at tight glucose control typically result in frequent hypoglycaemic episodes.- Hypoglycaemia is dangerous and may result in:
- Permanent neurological injury
- Cardiac arrest
- Hyperglycaemia
Is relatively benign in the short term.
- Hypoglycaemia is dangerous and may result in:
Pathophysiology
Hyperglycaemia:
- Commonly occurs in critically ill patients
- Secondary to ↓ hepatic response (resistance) to insulin
- Associated with ↑ mortality
- Associated with
- Impaired immune function
- Impaired wound healing
Hypoglycaemia:
- Associated with ↑ morbidity and mortality
- Occurs with intensive insulin therapy
Management
Key Studies
BSL control:
- NICE-SUGAR (2009)
- ~6000 Australasian/American patients with a >3 day ICU admission and no PO intake over that time, without DKA, HHS, or insulin-affecting disease
- Unblinded, multicentre (38) RCT with minimisation algorithm to minimise differences between regions and surgical/non-surgical patients
- 6100 patients provides 90% power for 3.8% ARR ↓, assuming baseline 30% mortality
- Tight vs. conventional BSL control
- Tight control
- Aimed BSL 3.5-6mmol/L
- Insulin ceased if BSL <4.5mmol/L
- Conventional control
- Aimed BSL <10mmol/L
- Insulin ceased if BSL <8mmol/L
- Tight control
- Tight control required ↑ insulin (97% vs. 69%)
- Tight control had ↓ BSL (6.4 vs. 8mmol/L)
- Significant ↑ 90 day mortality with tight control (27.5% vs. 24.9%)
- No difference in 28 day mortality, ICU length of stay, or need for organ support
Unclear why the mortality ↑ is not replicated at 90 days if true, given the short-term nature of the treatment.
References
- Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283-1297. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810625