Cardiac Failure
Range of syndromes characterised by impediment to ventricular filling or ejection due to structural or functional myocardial disease, classified by:
Stage C and D disease are also staged by function, using either the NYHA or INTERMACS grade.
- Clinical and functional stage
Based on clinical features and used to guide tiers of therapy:- Stage A: At-risk
Asymptomatic, with risk factors. - Stage B: Pre-heart failure
Asymptomatic, with structural heart disease. - Stage C: Heart failure
Currently or previous clinical heart failure. - Stage D: Advanced heart failure
Severe clinical failure despite medical therapy, requiring advanced therapies or palliative care.
- Stage A: At-risk
- Ejection Fraction
Important for prognostication and determining likelihood of response to clinical therapy. Divided into:- HFpEF (EF >50%)
Normal EF with evidence of spontaneous or provokable ↑ filling pressures, e.g:- ↑ BNP
- Echocardiographic ↑ filling pressure
- Invasively ↑ filling pressure
- HFmrEF (EF 41-49%)
Generally on a dynamic trajectory to either improvement to HFpEF or decline to HFrEF. - HFrEF (<40%)
Echocardiographically ↓ ejection fraction.- HFimpEF defines a subgroup of HFrEF where EF has improved to >50% with medical therapy
- HFpEF (EF >50%)
NYHA | INTERMACS | Capacity |
---|---|---|
I | Asymptomatic, with no physical limitations. |
|
II | Comfortable at rest. Slight symptoms with ordinary activity. |
|
III | 7 | Comfortable at rest. Symptomatic with less than ordinary activity. |
IV | 6 | Symptomatic at rest. Exertion limited by symptoms. |
5 | Exertion intolerant. | |
4 | Symptomatic at rest on oral therapy. | |
3 | Stable on inotropes. | |
2 | Progressive decline (‘sliding’) on inotropes. | |
1 | Critical cardiogenic shock. | |
Notes: |
|
Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- Prevalence of chronic heart failure is ~2%
- <2% in <60 year-olds
- >10% in >75 year-olds
- Lifetime risk of disease is ~20%
- Annual mortality is 6-7% in patients with stable heart failure
- ↑ to 25%/year in hospitalised patients
Pathophysiology
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction:
Aetiology
Precipitating causes:
- Cardiac
- Arrhythmias
- AF
- Ischaemia
- AMI
- Angina
- Hypertensive emergency
- Mechanical
- Valvular
- Tamponade
- PE
- Arrhythmias
- Neurological
- Neuromuscular disease
- Infective
- Sepsis
- Pneumonia
- Myocarditis
- Toxins
- Alcohol
- Beta-blockade
- Calcium antagonists
- Cocaine
- Chemotherapy
- Genetic
- Muscular dystrophies
- Desmoplakin cardiomyopathy
- Other
- Peripartum
- Autoimmune
- Giant Cell Myocarditis
May recur after heart transplant. - Sarcoidosis
- Iron overload
Assessment
Stage | Features | Caveats |
---|---|---|
A | Risk factors:
|
|
B | Evidence of:
|
|
C | Features of heart failure | |
D | Marked features that interfere with daily life and result in recurrent hospitalisation |
History
Symptoms of heart failure:
- Dyspnoea
May be secondary to:- Pulmonary oedema
Pulmonary congestion due to raised LAP. Moderately sensitive but poorly specific. - Pleural effusion
Fluid retention and elevated RAP/ Classically bilateral, due to pulmonary congestion.
- Pulmonary oedema
- Orthopnoea
↑ VR and pulmonary congestion in supine position.- More specific than dyspnoea, but insensitive
- PND
As orthopnoea, but with additional respiratory depression. - Palpitations
Tachyarrhythmias and reduced exercise tolerance. - Early satiety
Fluid retention. - Anorexia
Fluid retention. - Fatigue
Reduced skeletal muscle perfusion.
Examination
- Cachexia
Intestinal congestion, chronic inflammatory pathway activation. - Crepitations
Secondary to pulmonary oedema. - Elevated JVP
↑ RAP. - Displaced apex beat
LV dilatation. - Hepatomegaly
↑ RAP. - Hepatojugular reflex
↑ RAP. - Ascites
Fluid retention. - Oedema
Fluid retention and elevated filling pressures.- Insensitive
Many elderly patients have oedema due to immobility.
- Insensitive
Diagnostic Approach and DDx
Investigations
Bedside:
- Blood gas
- Lactate
- SvO2
- Bedside echocardiogram
- Systolic function
- Filling state
- Structural disease
- PAC
May be useful in:- Cardiogenic shock
- Uncertain haemodynamic state
i.e. Mixed shock.
Oxygen saturation of central or mixed venous blood indicates the degree of oxygen extraction and is one marker (with many caveats) of the adequacy of tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery.
SmvO2 | Interpretation |
---|---|
>75% | Normal |
50-75% | ↑ VO2/↓ DO2 |
30-50% | Exhaustion of extraction reserve |
<30% | Significant anaerobic metabolism |
Notes | ScvO2 is usually 2-3% lower than SmvO2 due to ↓ O2 extraction from the lower body, but will trend in parallel |
Laboratory:
The level of an ↑ BNP and NT-proBNP both have prognostic significance.
- Blood
- Troponin
- BNP
Released in response to ↑ ventricular wall tension.- <100pg/mL is 90% sensitive/70% specific for excluding failure
- Echocardiography indicated if >35pg/mL
- May be normal in HFmrEF or HFpEF
- NT-proBNP
Prohormone of BNP.- Similar sensitivity to BNP with cut-off of >300pg/mL300
- Echocardiography indicated if >125pg/mL
- Monoclonal light chains
If concern for cardiac amyloidosis.
- Urine
- Monoclonal light chains
As blood.
- Monoclonal light chains
- Endomyocardial biopsy
Indicated if suspecting a particular diagnosis, e.g.- Amyloidosis
- Infiltrative disease
- Acute rejection following transplant
- Rapid deterioration despite optimal medical therapy
Imaging:
- CXR
- Pulmonary oedema
- Venous congestion
- Cardiomegaly
- Serial echocardiogram
Recommended for patients following a significant change in clinical status. - Cardiac MRI
Excellent anatomical characterisation. Useful in:- Congenital heart disease
- Unsuccessful echocardiography
Other:
- 6MWT
Distance correlates with VO2 and prognosis. Thresholds include:- >490m results in ↓ utility of the score
Due to poorer correlation. - <300m correlates with NYHA III/IV symptoms
- >490m results in ↓ utility of the score
- CPET
VO2 <14mL/kg/min may indicate better survival with transplantation.
Diagnostic Approach and DDx
Management
Effective heart failure management relies on achieving balance between the competing goals of ensuring adequate organ perfusion whilst minimising myocardial work. The choice of therapy depends on the degree of cardiopulmonary reserve of the patient, and so patients can be divided into:
- Haemodynamically stable
Myocardial function adequate to meet demands. Anti-failure therapy aims to:- ↓ Rate of functional decline
- Counteract maladaptive physiological processes
- Haemodynamically marginal
Myocardial function barely adequate to meet demands, such that many elements of anti-failure therapy may need to be ceased or reduced due to intolerance. - Haemodynamically unstable
Myocardial function inadequate to meet demands; essentially on a cardiogenic shock spectrum. Therapy aims to:- ↑ Organ perfusion with inotropes and diuresis, whilst preventing excess myocardial work
If this balance cannot be achieved with medical therapy, then mechanical support may be required.
- ↑ Organ perfusion with inotropes and diuresis, whilst preventing excess myocardial work
Haemodynamically Stable Disease
- Prevent further deterioration by controlling risk factors
- Determine the ejection fraction
- Early medical management with anti-failure therapies
The **“four pillars”* of heart failure. - Consider ICD or CRT-D if EF <35%
This section is tailored towards management of stable heart failure in the critical care setting; lifestyle and risk factor modification is underrepresented.
Specific therapy:
Avoid β-blockade in patients with severely ↓ LVEF to avoid precipitating cardiogenic shock.
- Pharmacological
- Anti-failure therapy
The four pillars of antifailure therapy are indicated for HFrEF or HFimpEF, and consist of:- RAAS inhibition
↓ BP and maladaptive remodelling, ↓ mortality, hospitalisations, and progression. One of:- ARNI
Recommended in NYHA II/III disease. Contraindicated if:- History of angioedema
- ACEi use in previous 36 hours
- A2RB
Preferred if recent MI, intolerance to ACEi, or requirement for ARNI. - ACE inhibitor
De-emphasised due to inferiority to ARNI.
- ARNI
- β-blockade
Improve symptoms and ↓ arrhythmia-related mortality. Use either:- Bisoprolol
- Carvedilol
- Slow-release metoprolol
- Aldosterone antagonists
↓ Mortality and morbidity, indicated for NYHA II-IV disease.- Spironolactone 12.5-50mg PO OD
- Commence at 25mg if eGFR >50mL/min/1.73m2
- Double dose after 1 month
- Contraindications:
- eGFR >30mL/min/1.73m2
- K+ <5.0mmol/L
Incidence of hyperkalaemia is rare.
- Requires regular review of potassium
- Spironolactone 12.5-50mg PO OD
- SGLT2i
↓ Mortality, hospitalisations, dialysis, and rate of renal decline.- Empaglifozin 10mg daily
- RAAS inhibition
- Diuresis
Goal is to relieve clinical evidence of congestion at the lowest possible dose.- Diuretic therapy should be escalated in a stepwise fashion:
- Loop diuretic
- Thiazide
May be added if:- Hypertension
- Fluid retention refractory to loop diuretics
- Exacerbations requiring hospital admission generally require:
- Doubling the usual daily dose, and administering IV
Results in a 4× effective furosemide dose. - Addition of a thiazide
- Doubling the usual daily dose, and administering IV
- Diuretic resistance can be managed in a stepwise fashion:
- ↑ Furosemide dose
- Add thiazide
- Commence furosemide infusion
- Sequential nephron blockade
- Diuretic therapy should be escalated in a stepwise fashion:
- Statin
Indicated with any history of ACS. ↓ Failure and further cardiovascular events. - Additional therapies
May be considered once the above therapies are instituted and doses have been optimised. Include:- Digoxin
NYHA II-III HFrEF; ↓ hospital admissions but not mortality. - Ivabradine
NYHA II-III HFrEF with LVEF <35% and in NSR >70bpm despite maximally tolerated dose of β-blocker.
- Digoxin
- GTN
Indicated for relief of dyspnoea (in addition to diuretics) in patients without hypotension.
- Anti-failure therapy
- Procedural
- ICD
Indicated if LVEF <35% and estimated >1 year survival. - CRT-D
Combination resynchronisation therapy and ICD is indicated if an ICD is indicated and there is preserved sinus rhythm with a LBBB. Benefit is proportional to the QRS width. - CABG
Surgical revascularisation ↓ mortality hospital admission for patients with 3VD, left main (or equivalent) disease, and LVEF <35%. This benefit ↓ with ↑ age.
- ICD
- Physical
- NIV
CPAP is beneficial in APO, by improving oxygenation and ↓ LV afterload.
- NIV
The principles of HFpEF management are similar, although the evidence base supporting therapies are much weaker. In general, treatment should include:
- RAAS inhibition
- Aldosterone antagonist
- Diuretic PRN
Diuretic resistance can be defined as inadequate solute and water clearance despite 160mg/day of furosemide.
Class | Drug | Initial Daily Dose | Maximum Total Daily Dose | Duration of Action |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loop diuretics | Bumetanide | 0.5–1.0mg OD/BD | 10mg | 4–6h |
Furosemide | 20–40mg OD/BD | 600mg | 6–8h | |
Thiazide diuretics | Chlorthiazide | 250–500mg OD/BD | 1000mg | 6–12h |
Chlorthalidone | 12.5–25mg OD | 100mg | 24–72h | |
Hydrochlorothiazide | 25mg OD/BD | 200mg | 6–12h | |
Indapamide | 2.5mg OD | 5mg | 36h | |
Metolazone | 2.5mg OD | 20mg | 12–24h |
Benefit from β-blockade does not appear to be a class effect - only a limited number of agents are shown to have benefit.
Drug | Initial Daily Dose | Target Daily Dose | Mean Achieved Dose |
---|---|---|---|
Bisoprolol | 1.25mg OD | 10mg OD | 8.6mg |
Carvedilol | 3.125mg BD | 25–50mg BD | 37mg |
Carvedilol CR | 10mg OD | 80mg OD | |
Metoprolol CR | 12.5–25mg OD | 200mg OD | 159mg |
GTN is particularly important with acute LV failure in the setting of hypertension - rapid afterload reduction can quickly unload the LV, reverse APO, and stave off the requirement for intubation. Rapid IV administration is best performed with invasive pressure monitoring.
Supportive care:
- H
- VTE prophylaxis
- Correct iron deficiency
Disposition:
Preventative:
- Risk factor modification
- OSA treatment
- Regular physical activity
- Healthy dietary patterns
- Smoking cessation
- SGLT2 inhibitor
Generally contraindicated in the critical care setting. - Anti-failure therapy
↓ Readmission in chronic failure.
Haemodynamically Unstable Disease
- Revascularisation
For acute MI. - Inotropic support
Use the lowest dose tolerated for the shortest amount of time possible. - Consider mechanical support
If adequate organ function is not maintained by inotropes. - Transplantation workup
Resuscitation:
- C
- Inotropic support
- Rotation may be required in long-term infusions to minimise tachyphylaxis
- ↑ Arrhythmia burden
- Appropriate for palliation and symptomatic relief
- Choice is guided by:
- Availability
- Blood pressure
- Arrhythmia burden
- Inotropic support
Specific therapy:
Inotropic support is covered in detail under Inotropes.
- Pharmacological
- Procedural
- Revascularisation
For acute MI. - Durable LVAD
Selected patients with INTERMACS 3 disease. May be used as:- Destination therapy
- Bridge-to-transplant
- Heart transplantation
- Temporary mechanical circulatory support
Temporary mechanical support may for patients in cardiogenic shock as:- Bridge-to-decision
Determine eligibility of transplant. - Bridge-to-bridge
Stabilise prior to durable VAD insertion.
- Bridge-to-decision
- Revascularisation
- Physical
Temporary mechanical support may consist of ECMO, temporary LVAD, or temporary RVAD.
Supportive care:
Disposition:
Preventative:
Marginal and Ineffective Therapies
- Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
Negative inotropic effects may be poorly tolerated compared to β-blockers. - Glitazones
↑ Rate of hospitalisations. - Fluid restriction
Unclear benefit: No change in hospitalisation or mortality.
Anaesthetic Considerations
Improving Organ Perfusion
- Afterload
Reduce with systemic vasodilators.- IV
- GTN
- SNP
- Milrinone
- IV
- Preload
- Contractility
- Cease negative inotropes
- Inotropes
- Rate
↑ to high normal (~90); CO may fall with ↑ tachycardia depending on the diastolic function. - Rhythm
Restore sinus rhythm.
Reduce Myocardial Work
- Afterload
Reduce with systemic vasodilators.- PO
- ACE-I
- PO
- Contractility
- Negative inotropes
Improvement in ventricular filling, coronary perfusion, and myocardial oxygen demand.
- Negative inotropes
- Preload
- Rate
- Rhythm
Restore sinus rhythm.
Mechanical Support
- Respiratory
- NIV
Positive airway pressures CPAP, PEEP) reduces LV wall tension and afterload. - Mechanical ventilation
In addition to the effects of ↑ airway pressure, mechanical ventilation substantially reduces work of breathing and therefore VO2. These gains may be significant (up to 30%), but is not a long-term solution.
- NIV
- Cardiac
- IABP
- VAD
- Temporary
- Permanent
- ECMO
Additional Physiological Goals
Correct:
- Hypoxia
- Acidaemia
- Electrolyte derangements
- Anaemia
- Thiamine deficiency
Marginal and Ineffective Therapies
Complications
- C
- AF
- Present in ~30% of patients
- May be either a cause or consequence
- Malignant arrhythmias
- ↑ Risk with:
- Ischaemia
- Electrolyte abnormalities
Hypo/hyperkalaemia, hypomagnesaemia.
- Psychotropic drugs
- Digoxin
- Antiarrhythmics
- ↑ Risk with:
- AF
- H
- Thromboembolism
Prognosis
- Death
- High in symptomatic heart failure
- 20-30% one-year mortality in mild cases
- ⩾50% one-year mortality in severe heart failure
- Predictors of poor outcome include:
- High NYHA class
- Reduced LVEF
- Raised PCWP
- Third heart sound
- Reduced CI
- DM
- Hypernatraemia
- Elevated catecholamines
- Low predicted peak oxygen consumption with maximal exercise
- High in symptomatic heart failure
Key Studies
References
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895–1032.
- Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Young JB, Jessup M, Miller L, Kormos RL, et al. INTERMACS Profiles of Advanced Heart Failure: The Current Picture. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2009 Jun 1;28(6):535–41.
- Metra M, Teerlink JR. Heart failure. Lancet. 2017;6736(17). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31071-1.
- ABC of heart failure: Clinical features and complications [Internet]. [cited 2019 Dec 9].
- Bloos F, Reinhart K. Venous oximetry. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul 1;31(7):911–3.