Risk and Consent

This is specific to the Australian legal context

Every individual has a right to:

Practically, adequate discussion of risk is a precursor to gaining informed consent from a patient, and is a moral and legal requirement. How this discussion takes place, and how much information to be given depends on:

Risk

Use BRAN: * Benefits * Risks * Alternatives * Nothing
What will happen if we do nothing.

Discussion should:

  • Be based upon:
    • Seriousness and nature of the condition
    • Complexity of the surgery
    • Questions asked by the patient
    • Patients attitude and level of understanding
  • Include:
    • Rare but severe harms
    • Common but minor harms
    • Uncertainty relating to outcomes
    • The risk of doing nothing
    • Financial implications
      If relevant.
  • Be performed by:
    • A person able to understand and discuss the risks and benefits of the treatment
    • A qualified interpreter if necessary
      Not a family member.
    • The anaesthetist providing the anaesthetic
      • A separate anaesthetist may interview and discuss risk with the patient, but the treating anaesthetist is liable if inadequate consent is obtained by another on their behalf

Negligence

Negligence requires:

  • A duty of care exists
    Basically assumed in medical cases.
  • Duty of care has to be breached
  • Harm has to be suffered
  • Harm would not have occurred if breach did not occur

References

  1. ANZCA. PS26: Guidelines on Consent for Anaesthesia or Sedation.
  2. Burke, J. Elements of risk and consent. ANZCA Part 2 Course. 2020.