Venous Thromboembolism

Major cause of perioperative and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Perioperative VTE:

Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Epidemiology:

  • May affect up to 25% of inpatients

Risk factors:

  • Surgery
    Single most important risk factor, although varies with type of surgery.
  • Immobility
  • Hospitalisation
  • Malignancy
  • OCP use
    4-fold risk.
  • Factor V Leiden
    7-fold risk.

Pathophysiology

Thrombi:

  • Develop in regions of reduced flow:
    • Commonly around valve pockets
    • Due to venous stasis
      Two types of venous flow:
      • Continuous venous flow
        Laminar flow due to vis a tergo, and dependent on organ flow. May be impaired by venous outflow obstruction:
        • Positioning
        • Tissue oedema
      • Intermittent flow
        Due to muscular pump, and important in preventing stasis in valve pockets. Impaired by:
        • General anaesthesia
        • Bed rest
  • Initially consist of ‘red clots’
    Predominantly RBCs and fibrin, and are key in clot formation.
    • White clot forms as platelet and leukocyte layers accumulate
      These components are key in clot propagation.

Valve function is dependent on normal endothelial function:

  • Venous valves secrete:
    • Greater amounts of anti-coagulant factors
      Thrombomodulin, endothelial cell protein C receptor.
    • Lower amounts of procoagulant factors
      ul-VWF.

Aetiology

Clinical Manifestations

Diagnostic Approach and DDx

Investigations

Management

Prevention

  • Multiple strategies exist
  • Institutional guidelines will dictate practice
  • Implementation of guidelines is usually poor

Methods include:

  • Mechanical
    • Minimise non-pulsatile flow
      • Early ambulation after surgery
      • Regular foot and calf exercises
        At least every 2 hours.
    • Intermittent pneumatic compression devices
      • Cornerstone of prevention
        • Should be used for at least 18 hours/day whilst non-ambulant
        • Should be applied intraoperatively for high risk cases
        • Patient compliance is critical
      • More effective than stockings
      • May be as effective as pharmacological methods, without ↑ risk
      • Contraindications:
        • Presence of acute DVT
        • Severe peripheral vascular disease
        • Recent skin graft
        • Deformity
        • Pressure injury
        • Peripheral neuropathy
    • Graduated Compression Stockings
      Provide no benefit when used in addition to pharmacological prophylaxis.
      • May still be indicated in other settings
        e.g. Heart failure.
      • Should not be worn under intermittent pneumatic compressors
      • Should only be applied in high risk patients, with a contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis, and pneumatic compressors are not available or contraindicated
    • Inferior vena caval filters
      Can be considered if pharmacological prophylaxis is contraindicated and there is either a:
      • Spinal cord injury
      • Major pelvic fracture
      • Known acute VTE
  • Pharmacological
    Institution of pharmacological prophylaxis needs to be tailored to bleeding risk.
    • Aspirin
      • Anti-platelet effect limits clot propagation
      • Reduced bleeding and infectious complications compared with anticoagulants
        May not be additive with anticoagulants.
      • May be as effective as warfarin in LMWH
    • Enoxaparin
      • Favoured due to best efficacy/bleeding risk
      • Dosing:
        • Usual: 40mg SC daily
        • CrCl <30ml/min: 20mg daily
        • Weight <50kg: 20mg daily
        • Weight >130kg: 60mg daily or 40mg BD
          Consider seeking haematological advice.
    • UFH
      • Reasonable alternative to LMWH in patients with renal insufficiency
    • Fondaparinux
      • Reasonable alternative to LMWH and UFH in HITS
    • NOACs
      • Equivalent risk reduction to LMWH
      • Evidence in favour of use stronger in some orthopaedic populations
      • ↑ bleeding complications relative to LMWH

Risk Assessment

In general, surgery risk is proportional to the duration and extensiveness of the surgery, and period of post-operative immobilisation

Into high-risk and low-risk of clotting, by inpatient type:

  • Medical patient
    High risk
    • Age > 60
    • Ischaemic CVA
    • Previous VTE
    • Active malignancy
    • Decompensated CCF
    • Acute-on-chronic lung disease
    • Acute inflammatory disease
    • Acute neurological disease
    • Sepsis
    • Obesity
    • Varicose veins
    • OCP use
  • Surgical patient
    • Major trauma
      • Multitrauma
      • TBI
      • Truncal trauma
      • Spine fracture or SCI
      • Long bone fracture
    • Malignancy
    • Major abdominal surgery
    • Laparascopic major abdominal surgery with one other risk factor

Anaesthetic Considerations

Marginal and Ineffective Therapies

Prevention:

Complications

Prognosis

Key Studies


References

  1. Gordon RJ, Lombard FW. Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism: A Review. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017 Aug;125(2):403–12.