CICM Final Exam
The CICM final exam consists of a:
- Written exam
Aims to assess knowledge.- Two 150 minute/15 question SAQ papers
- 10 minutes reading time
- Oral viva
Aims to assess judgment.- Eight 10 minute stations
Always:- Radiology
- Communication
- Consistently has a high maximal mark
Opportunity to do very well. - Determine what sort of meeting this is
- Consistently has a high maximal mark
- Equipment
- 2 minutes reading time per station
- Radiology viva reading time is reviewing images
- Break stations
- 1 break after communication station
- Eight 10 minute stations
- Hot case
Aims to assess wisdom and real-world clinical decision making.
Timing
- Read
- Note eligibility requirements
- Dates
- Discuss with recent supplicants what is involved
- Discuss
- Mentors and supervisors
- Am I ready?
- When should I sit?
- Partner, family, and friends
Understand:- What is involved
- The degree of sacrifice required
- Mentors and supervisors
- Assess
- Is this an appropriate time?
- There is never a perfect time
- It will always be disruptive
- Some times will be less-bad than others
- Is this an appropriate time?
- Commit
- Outsource what you can
- Drop balls
Many other professional and personal commitments have to be shelved until the exam is behind you. - Don’t equivocate
Avoid dragging it out.
Written Exam
As with the primary examination, a structured answer format:
- Provides a scaffolding to hang ideas off and prompt your memory
- ↑ The chance you will deliver a complete answer
- Buys you thinking time
Your mind can think of content whilst you subconsciously outline the structure on the page. - ↓ Stress
- Is less painful to read, and therefore more favourable to mark
Glossary of Terms
These verbs detail the expectations for the answer:
Re-read the question half-way through your answer - make sure you are answering the question that is asked.
- Critically evaluate
Evaluate the evidence available relating to a topic.
- Outline
Provide a summary of the important points.- Breadth > depth
- Breadth > depth
- List
Provide a list.
- Compare and contrast
Provide a description of similarities and differences. You may tabulate your answer.- Provide a description of similarities and differences, not just a list
- Detail the significance of these differences
If the question says you may tabulate your answer, you should tabulate your answer.
- Assessment
Generic term that implies determining an underlying diagnosis, encompassing; history, clinical examination, and relevant investigations.- History
- Examination
- Investigations
- Prioritised differential diagnosis
- Indicators of severity
- Management
Generic term that implies determining an overall management plan, encompassing; resuscitation, definitive treatment, initial and ongoing monitoring with supportive treatment.- Principles
- Treatment Priorities
- Resuscitation
ABC approach. Comment on team coordination. - Specific therapy
- Pharmacological
- Procedural
- Physical
- Supportive care
- Disposition
- Discuss
Explain the underlying key principles. Where appropriate, this may include controversies and/or advantages and disadvantages.- Depth > breadth
- Controversies
- Pros and Cons
- Explain
Make plain, interpret, account for.- Reference to underlying theory and rationale
- Contextualised to the clinical scenario
Answer Templates
Structures for specific question formats:
- Adverse outcome
- Manage the patient
- Resuscitation
- Prevent further harm
- Administrative
- Patient and relatives
No fault apology and open disclosure. - Staff
- Department
e.g. QI, M&M. - Document
- Patient and relatives
- Manage the patient
- Critically evaluate
- Rationale
Importance of the issue, e.g.- Prevalence of disease
- Pathophysiology
- Unique features of the therapy
- Advantages of the intervention
- Disadvantages of the intervention
- Evidence
- Pros and cons of trials
- Limitations of trials
- Special situations
- Own practice
- Rationale
- Toxin
- Resuscitation
- Risk assessment
- Supportive Care
- Investigations
- Decontamination
- Enhanced Elimination
- Antidotes
- Disposition
Oral Exam
Viva
The oral section aims to assess whether you are ready to matriculate from training and assume the mantle of consultant. This is far more a question of mindset than of knowledge. Therefore:
- Embody the consultant
- Decide the type of consultant you want to be
- Be that person
- Have (or fake) confidence
- Engage with the consultant examiner as a respected equal
- Immerse yourself in the scenario
- Take some time to think of an answer
But not too much. - Be authentic
- Discuss balance of risks without waffling
- If you are unsure of a course of action, then describe your rationale
- Have some prepared statements phrases
- “In addition to my usual anaesthetic assessment…”
- Know what to say if you don’t know what to do
Pitfalls:
- Attitude
- Non-consultant like
- Indecisive
Using ‘could’ not ‘would.’ - Inflexible
- Refusing to be lead
- Waffling
- Too many lists
- Does not answer question
- Knowledge
- Insufficient
- Long checklists do not demonstrate understanding
- Inaccurate
- Not recognising knowledge gaps
Demonstrates lack of safety.
- Safety
- Inappropriate drug doses
- Does not know how to manage a crisis
- Lacks insight
- Refuses to accept guidance
Complete the CICM Communication Course prior to the exam; the communication viva scenario generally mirrors the course scenarios.
Hot Case
The hot case is the only part of the exam that assesses a candidate at the bedside. Hot cases are:
- Challenging
- Artificial
The scenario is clearly unrealistic - suspend your disbelief. - Incompletely correlated with clinical skill
Hot case performance does not equal clinical performance, however hot case practice ↑ hot case performance. - Routinely performed poorly
- 60-70% of candidates pass
- 30% of candidates pass both cases
- Fundamentally a vibe check
This is a test of “are you ready to be left in charge of the unit.” It is not a test of your ability to detect some arcane diagnosis.
The case itself consists of several stages:
The end-of-bed-o-gram and orbit provide the majority of useful clinical information, do not neglect them. Touching the patient is expected to occur at some point however, usually by the 2-3 minute mark.
My impression is that the most important stage of the hot case is the presentation - a good presentation can redeem a mediocre exam, but a good response to questioning can redeem neither.
- Clinical question
Brief stem with incomplete information, and a clinical question. - Reading time
2 minutes. Decide:- What potential clinical problems may this patient have?
- What part of the examination should be focused on?
- Likely follow-up questions
- Entrance
- Lights
- Gel hands
- Introduce yourself:
- To the patient
- To the nurse
- Ask about relevant position restrictions and languages barriers
- End-of-bed-o-gram
Stand at the foot of the bed and identify key room equipment. - Orbit
Circle the bed space to identify:- Infusions
- Nutrition
- Monitor
Ask for fevers. - Ventilation
Ask about:- Sputum
- Ventilator settings, if unfamiliar
- Catheters and drains
Ask for:- Urine output
- Drain output
- Infusions
- Clinical examination
- Begin with adequate exposure
- Structured approach
- Can ask key, targeted, relevant questions
Must be balanced.- Too many unnecessary or boilerplate questions suggest a lack of direction or thought
- Too few questions means key information may not be provided
- Intermission
Brief period during which:- PPE is doffed
- Hand hygiene occurs
- The clock is stopped
- You can collate your thoughts and prepare the presentation
- Presentation
3-5 minute presentation that should be concise, comprehensive, and rapidly delivered. This should:- Open with a brief, 1-2 sentence introduction that provides an overview of the clinical scenario
This is your opportunity to demonstrate that you have identified the major issues. - Answer the question
This should occur even if the answer is not clear - a precise answer will often be contingent on the availability and interpretation of ancillary information, which you do not have access to. - Provide a rationale for the answer
Signposted, systematic description of the justifications for that answer. - Outline any caveats
Signposted, systematic list of any concerns that may impact your decision, and how you plan to investigate them. - Finish with a list of relevant positive and negative findings from the clinical examination
- Open with a brief, 1-2 sentence introduction that provides an overview of the clinical scenario
- Further questioning
The hot case is like a tennis match in that the only part of the game that you can control is the serve - these are the examination and the opening of the presentation. Maximise this time.
References
- Hoffman, K. How the Hot Case Works. Intensive. 2021.